搜搜考试网简单的英语句子,帮忙看看是否正确.
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：搜搜考试网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/08/02 23:52:08
简单的英语句子,帮忙看看是否正确.
这里已经没有足够的食物给我们这些饥饿的人吃了.
1.There's not enough food for our very hungry people to eat.
2.There's not enough food for very hungry of us to eat.
3.There's not enough food for us that was very hungry to eat.
如果这三个句子有不正确的地方,麻烦帮我改改.最好简单说说句子成分.
这里已经没有足够的食物给我们这些饥饿的人吃了.
1.There's not enough food for our very hungry people to eat.
2.There's not enough food for very hungry of us to eat.
3.There's not enough food for us that was very hungry to eat.
如果这三个句子有不正确的地方,麻烦帮我改改.最好简单说说句子成分.
首先建议把"There's not"改成"There isn't".
如果用第一个句子,建议改成There isn't enough food for we hungry people to eat. 其中we和hungry people可以理解为同位语,起解释作用.we hungry people=我们这些饥饿的人.不需要加very.
第二个句子感觉有点怪.如果想表达非常饿,可以用starving
第三个句子不通,按照句子成分翻译的话,有一层意思是句子里说的food是只有非常饿的时候才能吃/或者太饿了以至于不能吃.food that was very hnungry to eat.
改成There isn't enough food for we hungry people to eat.之后第一个句子比较好.使用从句并不是一个很好的习惯,句子长而且不好理解.
再问： for 后面为什用we而不用“us hungry people”,难道同位语就是用第一人称么
如果用第一个句子,建议改成There isn't enough food for we hungry people to eat. 其中we和hungry people可以理解为同位语,起解释作用.we hungry people=我们这些饥饿的人.不需要加very.
第二个句子感觉有点怪.如果想表达非常饿,可以用starving
第三个句子不通,按照句子成分翻译的话,有一层意思是句子里说的food是只有非常饿的时候才能吃/或者太饿了以至于不能吃.food that was very hnungry to eat.
改成There isn't enough food for we hungry people to eat.之后第一个句子比较好.使用从句并不是一个很好的习惯,句子长而且不好理解.
再问： for 后面为什用we而不用“us hungry people”,难道同位语就是用第一人称么