英语翻译麻烦帮帮忙,我用软件翻译的实在不通顺Clusters and the new economics of comp

英语翻译
麻烦帮帮忙,我用软件翻译的实在不通顺
Clusters and the new economics of competition
Abstract:
Today's economic map of the world is dominated by what are called clusters:critical masses - in one place - of unusual competitive success in particular fields.Clusters are not unique,however; they are highly typical - and therein lies a paradox:the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy lie increasingly in local things - knowledge,relationships,motivation - that distant rivals cannot match.Untangling the paradox of location in a global economy reveals a number of key insights about how companies continually create competitive advantage.What happens inside companies is important,but clusters reveal that the immediate business environment outside companies plays a vital role as well.This role of locations has been long overlooked,despite striking evidence that innovation and competitive success in so many fields are geographically concentrated.
Full Text:
Copyright Harvard Business Review Nov/Dec 1998
[Headnote]
Paradoxically,the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy lie increasingly in local things -knowledge,relationships,and motivation that distant rivals cannot match.
NOW THAT COMPANIES can source capital,goods,information,and technology from around the world,often with the click of a mouse,much of the conventional wisdom about how companies and nations compete needs to be overhauled.In theory,more open global markets and faster transportation and communication should diminish the role of location in competition.After all,anything that can be efficiently sourced from a distance through global markets and corporate networks is available to any company and therefore is essentially nullified as a source of competitive advantage.
But if location matters less,why,then,is it true that the odds of finding a world-class mutual-fund company in Boston are much higher than in most any other place?Why could the same be said of textile-related companies in North Carolina and South Carolina,of high-performance auto companies in southern Germany,or of fashion shoe companies in northern Italy?
Today's economic map of the world is dominated by what I call clusters:critical masses-in one place -of unusual competitive success in particular fields.Clusters are a striking feature of virtually every national,regional,state,and even metropolitan economy,especially in more economically advanced nations.Silicon Valley and Hollywood may be the world's best-known clusters.Clusters are not unique,however; they are highly typical-and therein lies a paradox:the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy lie increasingly in local things -knowledge,relationships,motivation- that distant rivals cannot match.

竞争摘要的串和新经济学:今天的世界的经济上的地图被主导什么被被称作串的:兼于一身临界质量不寻常竞争性
成功的安置-特别是田野.串但是是并非独一无二;他们高度是典型-和在其中撒谎一反论:在一全球性经济中持久的
竞争性优势越来越在于本地东西--知识,关系,远房竞争对手不能和相配的动力-.排解在一全球性经济中位置的反
论关于公司怎样不断建立竞争性优势暴露许多重要洞察能力.在公司里面发生是重要的,也但是串暴露在公司之外
立即生意环境起充满活力作用.这位置的作用已经被尽管引人注目的革新和竞争性的这样多的田野的成功在地理学
中是集中的证据长时间忽略.
完整文本:十一月/以版权保护哈佛
大学商务评论1998年12月
[前言]自相矛盾地,在一全球性经济中持久的竞争性优势越来越在于本地东西知识,远房竞争对手不能和相配的
关系和动力.
公司来源能既然,资本,货物,从常常一个鼠标的点击地非常一般人的意见智慧的在全世界公司怎样关于和国家竞争的信息和技术应该是检修.在理论中,更开放全球性市场和更快运输和通讯将去减弱位置的在竞争中作用.毕竟,任何事情,其能从一距离通过全球性市场和社团的网络是高效sourced的是一竞争性优势的来源是任何公司可用的和因此被主要使无效.
但是如果然后,位置少一些,为什么要紧,在波士顿发现一个世界第一流-共同基金投资公司-公司的机运是与在其它一些安置的绝大部分中相比高得多的是是真实的吗?为什么同样的能被在北卡罗来纳和南卡罗来纳身上和纺织品-有关的公司的,在南方德意志高超的性能-汽车公司的或者在意大利北部时尚鞋公司的说?
今天的世界的经济上的地图被我所谓的串支配:兼于一身临界质量特别是安置的不寻常竞争性成功田野.串是一实际上每一个民族的引人注目的特征,地区,特别在更多中状态和甚至大都市经济节约提升国家.硅谷和好莱坞可以是世界的最著名的-串.串但是是并非独一无二;他们高度是典型-和在其中撒谎一反论:在一全球性经济中持久的竞争性优势越来越在于本地东西知识,关系,远房竞争对手不能和相配的动力.